In his book The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History, David Lowenthal describes the differences between history (defined as critical inquiry into the past) and heritage (defined as the use of the past to support a certain conclusion) and challenges that are faced by both. Lowenthal explains that the popularity of heritage has grown exponentially in recent years: "Memorials and monuments multiply, cities and scenes are restored, historic exploits are reenacted, flea-market kitsch is elevated into antiques. Retro-fashion rages and camcorders memorialize yesterday. Historic sites multiply from thousands to millions; 95 percent of existing museums postdate the Second World War" (Lowenthal 3).
Lowenthal goes on to describe how different individuals, families, communities, regions, and countries as well as ethnic, political, and religious groups use history as a way to find identity or belonging, to justify past or current actions, or to support their position on a current issue. With heritage, people are looking to find certain things and usually succeed. Often what is most significant is not was is said but, instead, what is left out.
Lowenthal goes on to describe how different individuals, families, communities, regions, and countries as well as ethnic, political, and religious groups use history as a way to find identity or belonging, to justify past or current actions, or to support their position on a current issue. With heritage, people are looking to find certain things and usually succeed. Often what is most significant is not was is said but, instead, what is left out.
In the past, most heritage issues had to deal with the elites of society, often emphasizing their glorious lineages, but today, heritage has become important to the populous. People now want to go to museums about how the common people lived, the small cottage where a country farmer lived, the factory where hundreds of workers eked out a living, etc.
With so many people fighting over heritage, it beg the question of who possesses this heritage. Does a man have the right to hold on to his grandfather's diary of World War II, when there are others who wish to know more about it? Should the nobility still in possession of their English country homes be allowed to keep them private when the English people believe such houses to be a part of their national heritage? Do U.S. museums have the right to hold on to Native American artifacts that many tribes want back? Since heritage deals with people possessing parts of the past, questions like these become huge issues for museums and heritage sites.Another interesting thing that Lownethal points out is his book is how peoples' admiration of the past causes that past to be damaged or altered. Lowenthal explains how the hoards of people who take pictures of the great works of art in museums cause the paintings to diminish over time, how the steps of castles are worn down by the numerous tourists who come to visit.
When I was able to spend a weekend in Paris, it was something of a disappointment. Paris was mainly full of non-French tourists. Even those who were French had learned to speak English to tourists. There was even a Burger King on the Champs Elysees. The culture of what I was able to see of the city was all over-run by tourists. One could observe French culture immortalized in paintings and buildings, but the living, people aspect of the French culture was hard to be found.
My weekend in London was even worse. I planed my trip looking forward to hearing all of those wonderful English accents that Americans love so much, but I hardly heard any. The staff at the hotel and the tourist shops were all recent immigrants, hardly speaking English, little lone the that of the Queen.
No comments:
Post a Comment